Woodstock’s Mayor Wants to “Change Behavior” by Cloaking a Tax Increase as Environmental Concern. I Guess He Really Is a Democrat After All.

Jewel ReceiptWoodstock’s ten-cent bag tax went into effect on January 1st, and I took an informal poll of shoppers as I walked the aisles at my local Jewel. Most seemed to know about it, but still had not brought their own reusable bags. I asked my cashier if there had been an uptick in the use of reusable bags, and she said “no”, and the young man bagging my groceries said the most frequent comment he was getting was that it’s not a big inconvenience to go outside of Woodstock to shop. I asked for a store bag to see how the charge is displayed on the receipt, and there it was.


In the minutes of the September 17th City Council meeting, Mayor Brian Sager said the context of the program is not to be a revenue generator, but to change behavior. He noted the City distributed a reusable bag to every household and also passed them out to retailers for distribution to the public. He stated there are also many places that give bags away free of charge, providing the public with many opportunities to acquire reusable bags. Mayor Sager noted it a is way to change behavior to reduce the use of plastic and paper bags…which is what is wanted.


If it’s not a revenue measure, if it’s really about changing behavior, why not allow the store to keep all ten cents, as Edwardsville, Illinois did with the ten-cent per bag fee it imposed in October? According to Edwardsville Alderman S.J. Morrison:


“We didn’t want this perceived as a tax,” Morrison said. “It truly isn’t a tax. It’s a fee imposed on single-use bags. You can’t get out of a tax. You can avoid a fee by bringing your own bag. And it’s not a money grab by the city. We are not trying to raise revenue. We’re trying to change behavior.”


Of the ten cents collected for each bag in Woodstock, the retailer keeps three cents and the remaining seven cents goes to the City. That certainly sounds like a revenue measure to me.

.Tote Bag

I’m not against reducing the amount of plastic in landfills and streams, and I’m happy to use my own reusable bags, but the sanctimony on display in this instance is just too much. Cloaking a tax increase under the guise of environmental concern is no way to be open and transparent to those you would hope to represent.


Own it, Mr. Mayor. It’s all yours.

This entry was posted in 2020 Election, Local Government, Taxes and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Woodstock’s Mayor Wants to “Change Behavior” by Cloaking a Tax Increase as Environmental Concern. I Guess He Really Is a Democrat After All.

  1. Michael Stanard says:

    Brilliant observation. Sager is “phony” Democrat and had been aRepublican throughout his entire 30 years on the Woodstock City council until he became. “Jack Franks Democrat” after Franks appointed him to. $25.000 per year patronage job . Disgusting

  2. Lani Murphy says:

    Oh yeah. Just like the canvas bags that went out to 15000 people within the city limits disguised as GIFTS when he was re-running for Mayor.

    Those GIFTS cost us taxpayers $45,000 !!!! That was nothing more than his campaign swag paid for by us!

    And now this! He’s ruined Woodstock and won’t be satisfied til he has a hand in putting the final nail in Illinois’ coffin!

  3. Tom says:

    Question. The store already provide bag recycling. So why the tax. In time, people will stop or limit shopping in Woodstock. Then were is all the other taxes are going??? Way too much government control/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *